Top 10 AD Characters
6 of the Best Tarantino Scenes
Unlikely Romantic Scenes
Who Could Join Avengers 2?
The Hangover Part 3 Interviews

Why Sucker Punch Deserves A Second Chance

StumbleUponRedditPinterestShare

To the discerning film fan the modern multiplex can be a depressing and woefully uninteresting place to quench one’s thirst for cinematic pleasures. Filled as it so often is with unrelentingly banal and superficial Hollywood spectacles that fail to even be the simplistic fireworks displays that they appear to promise to be.

To find a film that is also actually about something is like trying to find a tiny nugget of gold in an increasingly deep pile of manure. Aiding you in avoiding the bulk of the pile is a kind of consensus opinion that tends to spread quickly regarding those films that simply add to that pile and in particular those that load it on in wheelbarrow fulls. This often doesn’t seem to make a difference to box office receipts though, Transformers 3 being a recent example of this trend, and sometimes this advance word also just gets it plain wrong. This latter situation appears to have been the way things went with Sucker Punch, a film that seemed so derided that when attending a semi-public advance screening I witnessed negativity thrown at Snyder during a pre-film Q&A, from people who hadn’t even seen the film yet.

This negativity was a microcosm of the explosion of bile thrown at the film by many that had seen the film and many that hadn’t. This dismissive reaction was a white noise that quickly drowned out any moderate voices or even impassioned defences. This film was bad, misogynistic and dumb. It must be true, it said so on the internet. But Sucker Punch is far from bad, the reports regarding its apparent misogyny seem to have been based a surface level reading of a far more complex issue that went mostly un-discussed and any suggestion that a film that deliberately layered text upon subtext in a way that worked (although admittedly occasionally stumbled) in a complex and incredibly difficult way can surely never be called dumb.

Sucker Punch has intellectual depth and complexity that has rarely been discussed and it is this depth and complexity that deserves a second (or indeed first – one reason why this piece will be low on spoilers) look. This is not a film to take some sort of passive approach to or ignore out of a perceived idea of what surface level pleasures it is supposedly relying on. These surface pleasures actually appear to have been the biggest distraction in the debates surrounding the film and it is not in the action sequences that the meat of the film’s more fascinating elements can be found. They are undeniably important but it is more what writer/director Zack Snyder and co-writer Steve Shibuya are saying about this kind of action and the significance of what surrounds the sequences, and what goes unseen whilst they take place, that holds the key to the film’s thematic depth.

Sucker Punch is, on one reasonably basic level, an action film about action films, or more specifically about films in which women are active players in the film but do so whilst using their sexuality or being subject to objectification and even abuse by men (and/or male filmmakers). Sucker Punch taps into a long running debate surrounding what is often an area of exploitation filmmaking that is incredibly problematic and fraught with complex arguments. As stated this is done so within the framework of a film that may on the surface appear to be a prime example of this very kind of filmmaking. It is this delicate balancing act that relies on some very tricky self-reflexism that makes for such a risky and fascinating piece of bravura filmmaking.

This de-constructive approach on display actually prompted the first film to come to my mind upon leaving the cinema to not be an excessive action spectacle but Bob Fosse’s personally self-reflexive film All That Jazz, a film that explored Fosse’s own status as a musical director but also unpicks the very nature of musicals. This approach is one that is very close to the thematic obsessions of Snyder in Sucker Punch. and they also both have engrossing representations of the film industry that do little to flatter those involved. Whilst Fosse was relatively explicit with his allusions, particularly when ‘he’ experiences heart surgery as the backers of his musical bet against him surviving, Snyder is more oblique in his approach. One reading of the film, for instance, could position Gorski (Carla Gugino) in the role of the struggling director, leaving  ’producer’ Blue (Oscar Isaac) and High Roller (Jon Hamm) to lobotomise and rape the leading ladies, but this is not the simple and narrow-minded approach taken by Snyder and Shibuya and things go beyond this rather simplistic reading.

All That Jazz (Bob Fosse, 1979)

Perhaps the most problematic aspect of Sucker Punch though, and one that has led to harsh if dare I say misguided criticism, is highlighted with the possible reading of pscho-drama psychiatrist/ dance instructor/Madam Gorski as a film director surrogate.  This underpins the most difficult issue facing Snyder in making Sucker Punch, using the very thing he is de-constructing and critiquing as a way to explore it. Accusations of him attempting to “have his cake and eat it” are quick to spring forth but these could well be more born out of the influence of the highly misleading and gratuitous marketing campaign than an analysis of the film. Isn’t the tricky game that Snyder and Shibuya are attempting to play one that leads to a richer and more fascinating text and isn’t it all the more impressive that they so often succeed. Surely the alleged compromise is not as much of an issue as it has been presented.

Think of the ‘Remember My Forgotten Man’ number from LeRoy and Berkeley’s Golddiggers of 1933 (a film that has a prominent visual reference in Sucker Punch), a sequence that directly references the depression and the plight of returning soldiers. Does the entertainment value, aided by the opulence of the number, the giant coins in the We’re in the Money sequence or the general lavishness of the production undermine the social commentary that is so significant in the film. It certainly impacts on it but the film is fascinating and vital regardless, it certainly doesn’t nullify what is clearly embedded in the text and the subtext. The truth with Sucker Punch appears to be that many refuse to see beyond its ‘Giant coins’ choosing to ignore the more substantive discussion points raised throughout.

In exploring the action and exploitation genre Snyder also eschews any simple answers, choosing not to preach to the audience a simple message, such as female empowerment comes through ass kicking action or that ass kicking action in a short skirt destroys any idea of female empowerment – two concepts that seem the only options in many critic’s minds. He instead chooses not to offer a narrow minded polemic but further problematises the debate, making it all the more interesting. Snyder chooses to explore a complex argument and offer no over-simplified solution, opening the debate and exploring competing ideas. Isn’t this something that we love filmmakers doing, not a cause for instant complaint and dismissal.

There is an area though where there is a clear focused line of argument that speaks strongly about the way males engage in watching women perform and it is an element in the film that seems very critical, despite the aforementioned multi-stranded approach. This is the focus on female subjugation and objectification through the action genre and the way in which this is explored though the choice to not show Baby Doll’s allegedly ”tittilating” dance, the dance is replaced by the elaborate action set pieces instead. Whilst the men in the brothel gawp at Baby Doll’s dance we are shown intricately constructed action set pieces that surely leave any engaged viewer with many conflicting thoughts. The choice to not show the dance is also a move that has had its point wonderfully proven with every new internet commentator that complains about not getting to see it or indeed a higher level of female flesh that they appear to have been promised by the already scant outfits.

Baby Doll’s dances are also explicitly critiqued by the character of Sweet Pea (Abbie Cornish), “The dance should be more than just titillation… what the heck does your’s say?”. Significantly Sweet Pea’s introduction in the brothel is on stage as she rehearses her own dance, one that mirrors Baby Doll’s impending lobotomy and also, crucially, Sweet Pea’s own appearance on ‘stage’ in the asylum. This appearance is her first introduction in the asylum and it is also our introduction to the pyscho-drama stage that Gorski uses to explore the girl’s most troubling memories, an approach mirrored in Gorski’s role in the brothel.

Sweet Pea’s memories are hinted to be somewhat related to the events we see in the opening, namely Baby Doll’s attempted escape from an abusing father. When a transition is made between the asylum and the brothel, Sweet Pea openly criticises the opening scene and comments on the idea that maybe a lobotomy (with hindsight read rape also) is not the sexiest of scenarios.

This mirroring and layering that pervades throughout Sucker Punch (even evident in the smartly redressed sets) is both the key to unlocking the narrative structure of Sucker punch but also the discussion being had in relation to thematic concerns.

I have been somewhat obtuse in the past two paragraphs, and to a lesser degree throughout this piece, in a deliberate effort to not reveal too much with regards to the plot in an effort to not spoil too much for a first time viewer or the pleasure of finding elements hitherto unnoticed for those who re-watch the film. This piece is not designed to be a thorough analysis of Sucker Punch, this would take many more thousands of words, but hopefully will have provided something of a counter argument to those stressing that this is a film to be avoided.

I’ve now seen Sucker Punch multiple times and have found new areas of interest with each watch and can also highly recommend checking out the extended cut, which builds satisfyingly upon the thesis already evident in the theatrical cut. This film is a rich text designed for an active viewer and if you are willing to engage with the film and explore its many facets you will, I’m sure, find much to consider and discuss.

Sucker Punch is now available to buy or rent on Blu-ray in a triple play edition that contains both the theatrical and the extended cuts.

Title: Why Sucker Punch Deserves A Second Chance
Reviewed by Craig Skinner on Aug 8
Rating:

Like HeyUGuys on Facebook




  • http://twitter.com/RealMattDamon Matt Damon (Not)

    Sorry, but Sucker Punch is a complete and utter nightmare as a cinematic experience, regardless of how deep it is. I look forward to it being greeted with a plethora of Razzie awards.

  • Mel

    This reading is closer to the truth for me: http://theoohtray.com/2011/04/david-frames-reviews-sucker-punch/

  • Stardust

    I really enjoyed reading this article and its so nice to see a more fair review of the film instead of one that just screams negativity.
    I really cannot understand why so many people seem to hate this film, I think many miss the complex and unique way in which Snyder has put it together and all the hidden depths which can be discovered on repeated viewing, but even still, if you look at it on a purely shallow and visual level it is still a very entertaining movie.
    I for one found it a welcome break from the tidal wave of unoriginal and boring films that are on the market at the moment. Many films theses days just stick to tried and tested formats and as a result there is never anything different out there.

  • Stardust

    I really enjoyed reading this article and its so nice to see a more fair review of the film instead of one that just screams negativity.
    I really cannot understand why so many people seem to hate this film, I think many miss the complex and unique way in which Snyder has put it together and all the hidden depths which can be discovered on repeated viewing, but even still, if you look at it on a purely shallow and visual level it is still a very entertaining movie.
    I for one found it a welcome break from the tidal wave of unoriginal and boring films that are on the market at the moment. Many films theses days just stick to tried and tested formats and as a result there is never anything different out there.

  • Max

    I agree with your statement that Sucker Punch is not a bad, misogynistic or dumb film, but I do think you’re reading too much into the psychology of the movie. While it is clearly intended to have a certain degree of depth or multi-layeredness, and is at times self-reflexive, I would in no way say that Snyder and Shibuya consciously tied it all up into a meticulously-crafted package awaiting your unwrapping. Most of the film’s writing and structure was so unpolished that I refuse to give them much credit for the parts that worked.

    Talking of the juxtaposition of action sequences and female empowerment, you say “Snyder chooses to explore a complex argument “. I disagree. I think that his mind is completely blank when he sends five hot girls into battle with big guns. He’s simply doing what he thinks will be cool, his vision for the film, and very little thought, let alone complex thought, has gone into the meaning it might have or how it relates to the rest of the story.

  • Snaredrum

    thank god it isn’t just me that sees this film as a masturbatory aid. Nicely written.

  • Snaredrum

    sees this film as MORE THAN JUST.

    stupid me

  • J. Elias

    I had high hopes for Sucker Punch; I love Emily Browning and the action
    scenes I saw in trailers looked promising. However, I was treated to a
    visually interesting movie with bad acting and a plot that didn’t
    actually make sense unless you like your plots to not make sense.
    <–see? That made sense.

    I agree that most pooh-poohed this film without giving it a fair shot,
    but what about those who DID see it and still hated it? (Speaking of
    plot-holes, a person does NOT look the same/pretty after a lobotomy like that).

    I agree with Max, Mel, and Matt (Not Damon?); I think you're reading WAY too much into the film. You can do that to ANY film, no matter how bad it is. I can write you a paper about how Harold and Kumar is an expressive film that discusses the expectations placed on second-gen foreigners, etc etc. But it doesn't mean that's what it was really about. :P

  • Vagina

    This is dreadfully written and nonsensical. Like Sucker Punch itself.

  • Igomunoz

    There’s a difference between the intentions of a filmmaker, free interpretations of his work and the actual results in the screen. ‘Inception’ is not perfect but works as an original action film and a personal statement of director Cris Nolan about the moviemaking process. The problem with ‘Sucker Punch’ is the same with Terry Gilliam’s ‘Tideland’; whatever the intentions of both directors they ended up with the opposite message on the screen. I don’t think Gilliam intented to understimate child abuse on his film but the images don’t lie. Same with Snyder, I don’t think his intention was to make a misogynistic film (from his previous work I doubt he thinks beyond making money), but the picture doesn’t lie: a group of girls guided by a ‘male’ warrior spirit fight in imaginary battles which in another plane are exploited cabaret dancers, and in a real plane of existance are mental patients being sexually abused. Gratuitous violence can be fun when it doesn’t involve a political message such as women giving up their bodies to free themselves from a patriarchal sistem; and this is not an interpretation, is the simple meaning conveyed by the images. I would be very careful to defend this film because the fact that you go to such great lenghts to redeem it, says more about ‘you’ than about the director or his screenwriter.

  • Mike Freed

    Meh. The challenge with Sucker Punch is that the brilliant visuals and clever metaphors are sunk by the brutal dialogue and wooden, one note characters. I wanted to love this movie as much as I wanted to love any movie featuring aerial battles between dragons and WWII bombers but was constantly rolling my eyes at the Scott Glenn platitudes and the stereotype characters, including, but not limited to ‘spunky heroine with heart of gold’ (all four of them), ‘high roller’ (seriously?) and ‘hot older dance instructor lady with European accent’. Not to mention ‘really bad bad guy who is sinister and controlling’ – I hated that guy.

    I know what you mean about second chances though, it was really ambitious and had amazing cinematic effects, so it is kind of brilliant.

  • http://www.videoconverterfactory.com/resource.html HughDiego

    Maybe the people hate this movie can not understand the director’s intentions. It is too abstract and leaping.

  • Anonymous

    I absolutely loved this movie. Look, there were steampunk robot Nazis and a huge freaking dragon. That was MORE than enough to satisfy *this* girl. But it went deeper than that, touching on such delicate issues as mental illness and PTSD–and giving sufferers not only power, but a voice as well, not to mention a weapon to fight with. If you’ve ever been close to someone with a mental illness, or been there yourself, you *know* that it truly is a battle. Making it a literal one within the film was an inspired idea, and I thought it worked very well.

  • Filmguy

    I never saw it in theatres. Then a lot of critics thought they were dishing out their most bitter invective in this (at the time) underperformed at-the-box-office picture. But eventually broke even due to DVD sales. From the trailers I knew this film would not satisfy everyone’s taste. But the funny thing is it got me excited, without seeing it, got me to go up and get it. It’s tempting to throw your best know-it-all-insults at this believe me. But I never nailed my ignorance to Zack Snyder’s creation, but allowed my imagination to find a unique composition, it’s uneven, it’s odd… love it or hate…this definately is a cult classic.

  • Filmguy

    I never saw it in theatres. Then a lot of critics thought they were dishing out their most bitter invective in this (at the time) underperformed at-the-box-office picture. But eventually broke even due to DVD sales. From the trailers I knew this film would not satisfy everyone’s taste. But the funny thing is it got me excited, without seeing it, got me to go up and get it. It’s tempting to throw your best know-it-all-insults at this believe me. But I never nailed my ignorance to Zack Snyder’s creation, but allowed my imagination to find a unique composition, it’s uneven, it’s odd… love it or hate…this definately is a cult classic.

  • sad

    This movie is the most misogynistic garbage I’ve ever seen.  I just watched it and had to try very hard not to get angry.  Snyder should be put down.

  • Texmurphy101

    What first drew me to the article was the title in defending the film. Even though I think the film desperatly needs to be re-done I still love to hear & read all perspectives.

    Snyder has a talent in bringing us beautiful films with fun & creative action that can only be fully appreciated on the big screen. But thats it. Looking at the film as a whole it seems that Snyder has some cool action scenes that he wanted to make into a movie which in turn he tacked on the asylum/brothel to make sense of it all. It could’ve been better if taken to time to reveal the story properly rather than thinking how the action sequences should be played out.

    I fully understand what Snyder was trying to do here & I don’t think sexy girls kicking ass was the issue. The themes of the action scenes appeared to be random as hell with no relation to the plot. You say there are these minor references that, to you are interesting, good for you. What.makes a film great is the ability to show what it wants as well as needs to get it perspecive across. Average film goers aren’t goin to pick up on these which is its downfall.

    You are trying to swim deeper in a shallow pool trying to delude yourself into thinking there is SOMETHING more meaningful here. There isn’t.