What went wrong with Star Trek 2
6 of the Best Tarantino Scenes
Epic Cast Interviews
Who Could Join Avengers 2?
The Hangover Part 3 Review

The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists Review

StumbleUponRedditPinterestShare

After making a seasonal splash with Arthur Christmas, Aardman are back in the realms of stop-animation (the first time since Wallace and Gromit’s run in with Were-Rabbit in 2005) with The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists.

The life of a notorious swash buckler on the high seas is a thrilling one, but amongst the vast consumption of rum bottles and the incessant timber shivering, the opportunity to be awarded the coveted Pirate of the Year Award ranks high on the list of achievements. This is the prime concern of The Pirate Captain (Hugh Grant) and his rag–tag crew (Martin Freeman, Brendan Gleeson, Russell Tovey and Ashley Jensen), who have competition for the trophy in the form of American rivals Black Bellamy (Jeremy Piven) and Cutlass Liz (Salma Hayek).

Docking in London with new associate Charles Darwin (David Tennant) in tow, the captain plans on capitalising on his exotic and incredibly rare Dodo (whom he has mistakenly believed to be a parrot up until now) by winning the Royal Society’s top prize for scientific discovery and earning him the right amount of gold to win him his cherished prize. His plans are thwarted by the dastardly, pirate-hating Queen Victoria (Imelda Staunton, having the most fun here) and with his pirate reputation in tatters, he must fight to regain his dignity and escape the gallows.               .

While Arthur Christmas managed that appease that modern, Pixar-fed audience whilst remaining true to the spirit of Aardman, for all the sterling work and effort involved here, ‘Pirates’ doesn’t quite delivers the same. It’s never less than entertaining, but it just feels dated at times, and the stop-animation (however brilliantly it’s done) sometimes hinders the storytelling process, and doesn’t quite keep up with the break-neck pacing the makers are aiming for. Maybe it’s a sad indictment of these attention-deficit times, but that energy which served the digitally-rendered ‘Arthur’ so well is a little absent here. You get those familiar, very English Aardman tropes, but rather than coming across as laugh-out-loud funny, they’re merely amusing and it’s almost as if director Peter Lord was unwilling to look beyond that tried and tested formula and push the (pirate) boat out a little more.

As ever, the character work is great, as are the long, illustrious list of acting talents who breathe life into the creations. The reinterpretation of Queen Vic as some kind of steam-punk/cyborg hybrid is nothing short of genius and many of the film’s best moments occur when she’s around. Grant is fine as the foppish leader, but his crew mates, particularly Martin Freeman and Brendan Gleeson, appear to be having the most fun here.

It’s a great-looking film and the exquisite craftsmanship is everything you expect from a production like this. The intricate, highly-detailed sets are truly a work of art. Unfortunately, being presented in 3D (a gimmick Aardman may have been initially reluctant to embrace) adds nothing whatsoever to proceedings and it ends up sitting uneasy with the very quant style of animation. Asking audiences to splash out extra for the privilege of wearing cumbersome, wholly unnecessary goggles (which distract from the film’s artistry) is totally unacceptable.

In many ways, The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists is still a fun and amiable children’s film, but in the current marketplace, it just feels like a minor step backwards for Aardman when it should have been a major leap ahead.

(3/5)

Title: The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists Review
Reviewed by Adam Lowes on Mar 23
Rating:

Like HeyUGuys on Facebook




  • NHL Jerseys

    Despite a little sag in the middle, where the script could have used some extra punch, this wonderfully imaginative movie succeeds in being that rare thing: a family film that the whole family will enjoy.

  • causticyoda

    whilst your critique is fair to good, it is difficult to agree with anything you said as there are so many spelling errors! you’ve written a few short paragraphs yet you lack the attention span to run a cursory glance over your work?! shoddy and unprofessional…

  • Anony Mouse

    Just come from the cinema after watching this.  I felt a little disappointed, but perhaps for different reasons than you.  My disappointment is not just with the pandering to American audiences by using American English spellings (Ham Nite?!!) in a film made by a British (Bristolian, no less!) company, starring British (and Irish) actors playing British (and Irish) characters.  

    The soundtrack was also a little grating, perhaps mostly so when a comedy song by Flight of the Conchords was shoe-horned in.  If a film is going to include a comedy song, it’s probably best if it’s written specifically for the film rather than appearing to piggy-back off a song written for a different context.  Then to top it all off, they seemed to go to the box labelled ‘cliche catchy feel-good’ for the end credits with an oft-overused Supergrass number.  But perhaps they couldn’t afford ‘Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life’.

    It was, however, an amusing way to spend an hour and a half and I’d happily admit I enjoyed it more than didn’t.  I’m just sorry I ignored the sign saying ‘leave your brain at the door’.

  • AndWot

    “American spellings”? Do you not think, perhaps, that the pirates, having had little education, might just have spelt ‘night’ wrong? And besides, Americans spell ‘night’ exactly the same as Brits, you moron.