What went wrong with Star Trek 2
6 of the Best Tarantino Scenes
Epic Cast Interviews
Who Could Join Avengers 2?
The Hangover Part 3 Review

Strippers Vs Werewolves Review

StumbleUponRedditPinterestShare

Director Jonathan Glendening of 13Hrs werewolf notoriety doesn’t move that far away from his furry feral fiends in his latest grizzly flick, Strippers Vs Werewolves.

This exceptionally daft, tongue-in-cheek pastiche of the erotic slasher B-movie also taps into the comic-book filmmaking fascination of recent years with deviant glee, but all with the sole purpose of entertaining in the most blood spewing and badly acted way. And for those who never tire of Robert ‘Freddy’ Englund cameos, there’s a treat for fans too.

After werewolf Mickey (Martin Kemp) is accidentally killed in strip club Vixens, the girls who work there have until the next full moon to work out how to respond and defend themselves, before his bloodthirsty wolf pack, led by Jack Ferris (Billy Murray), work out who is responsible and seek murderous retribution.

It’s not the pulpy title or necessarily the opening title sequence to Duran Duran’s ‘Hungry Like A Wolf” that pricks the interest, but the first doggy disposal that sets the stage for an indulgent retro farce, complete with a bit of healthy Essex ribbing, top 80s hits and some camp star turns. This film then takes its namesake by the balls and drags it forward, so much so, that there is little time for any real character evaluation, even though there is a vague attempt at introductions for such a low-budget film that’s primarily set on featuring carnage.

The impressive cast – that also includes turns from Steven Berkoff and Sarah Douglas – does the best of a B-movie situation, poking fun at the stereotypical roles they’ve been cast in, which increases the viewing pleasure. In fact, the dodgiest acting is the girls’ bad pole dancing on display, rather than Englund’s eternally corny bad guy snarl. Murray can always comfortably sneer for England, having played his fair share of bad guys too, so pulling it off as a deranged werewolf is no tall feat for the seasoned actor, matching Englund in their scenes.

However, the unexpected ‘star’ of the bloodbath is actually Simon ‘Jack’ Phillips in Pegg ‘Shaun of Dead’ deadpan mode. As the token comic-book geek, he provides the biggest laughs of the lot while battle his own demons while on a phone, and saves the film’s ending from the doggy mire.

Strippers Vs Werewolves is out to get outrageous cheap thrills – as silly as they are and propped up by great one-liners rather than a good scriptwriting at the irony of the idiotic situations. This enjoyable film makes no concessions for its lack of polish but is aided by a great cast who simply fit snugly into roles we’ve seen them in before, but shape shift for our pleasure. Plus the promise of eventually seeing these two groups battling it out in a strip joint is as titillating and ridiculous as it sounds, however over-edited the killing spree is.

(3/5)

Title: Strippers Vs Werewolves Review
Reviewed by Lisa Giles-Keddie on Apr 26
Rating:

Like HeyUGuys on Facebook




  • DireDanny

    When will Hey U Guys stop licking Simon Phillips arse?

  • movielover84

    Are Hey U Guys just trying to be mates with Simon Phillips? A ‘review’ should be honest, not just giving it a good review so as not to upset the filmmakers. Get a backbone Hey U Guys, be honest, both readers and filmmakers will respect you more for it!

  • http://www.heyuguys.co.uk HeyUGuys

    Thanks for the comment Movie Lover. Let me direct you to our 1.5* Kill Keith review which I do believe also starred Simon Phillips.

    http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/2011/11/12/kill-keith-review/

    All our reviews are of the opinion of the person reviewing it. If Lisa thinks this deserves 3 stars then that is what we give it.

    DS

  • movielover84

    Phillips was just an actor in Kill Keith though, as opposed to a producer on it. Just seems like you want to ensure you get your regular set visits on Simon Phillips’ films by giving softer reviews to the films he produces. If not, then I apologize, I guess Hey U Guys must simply have lower standards than most other movie reviewers. 

  • Filmfan99

    Got something personal against this guy by any chance?

  • jonlyus

    All the reviews on the site are the independent, critical opinions of our reviewers. We wouldn’t be doing this if it was any other way. We don’t have lower standards, just an expectation of our readers to understand this.

    JL

  • movielover84

     No not at all, in fact I respect Phillips’ work as a low-budget filmmaker, but I’d like to see Hey U Guys be a little more critical – and, in my opinion, realistic – with their reviews. Are we to believe that this film is REALLY only two stars away from masterpieces like The Dark Knight and Shawshank Redemption (which I presume would achieve 5 stars), or have certain low budget Brit filmmakers got a bit more of an easy ride because of the set access that Hey U Guys seem to get on Phillips’ own films?

    I’m just trying to see why they seem to not want to upset these filmmakers. I believe the first comment on this review was ‘arse licking’. Crude, and not my choice of words, but summed up my thoughts, and compelled me to question why Hey U Guys are seemingly treading on eggshells.

    If I watch this film and it really is 3/5 as good as Dark Knight or Shawshank, I’ll formally take back what I’ve said and apologize. But a film with a has-been/never-was cast in a low budget film called ‘Strippers Vs Warewolves’? …I’m not holding my breath.

  • Very angry person

    You are aware of course, that the reason the film has a “lack of polish” is because the director was removed from the project at the end of the shoot, had no involvement with Post-Production, so it’s ended up being a jumbled mess because it’s not the director’s vision.  People haven’t been paid, Jonathan Sothcott is an appalling producer and his reputation is starting to get around as someone to avoid in the UK film industry despite his self-promotion and giving himself star billing whenever he can.  A mess from start to finish.

  • Mymail

    The trouble with you, movielover, is you are a biased fool. You think that the reviewers opinion matters less than yours. Which, to you, it does. HOWEVER, the trouble here is with you trying to force your ideas down the throat of everyone present, and anyone that disagrees with you is wrong. If you don’t like the review, do it your own damn self so we can insist that your opinion is misguided and idiotic.