Robin Hood Review

Robin Hood is to premiere at the Cannes Film Festival this week but we’ve seen it and here’s our review. In the movie, we see Ridley Scott re-team with Russell Crowe in their fifth collaboration together. Many have wondered if Crowe can pull off the task of making a convincing Robin Hood.  Read on to find out what I thought! The cast  includes Cate Blanchett, Matthew Macfadyen, Mark Strong, Oscar Isaac, Kevin Durand, Mark Addy, William Hurt, Danny Huston and Max von Sydow.

This version of Robin Hood looks closely at how Robyn of Loxley becomes the man that we’ve come to know, and how he became one who steals from the rich to give to the poor. We get to see Robin (or Robyn if we believe the fables) fighting to get home after the crusades and how he comes to meet Will Scarlett (Scott Grimes who serves as the comic relief), Little John (Kevin Durand) and Friar Tuck (Mark Addy). Here’s a section of the official synopsis that can explain the wider storyline better than I.

Robin Hood chronicles the life of an expert archer, previously interested only in self-preservation, from his service in King Richard’s army against the French. Upon Richard’s death, Robin travels to Nottingham, a town suffering from the corruption of a despotic sheriff and crippling taxation, where he falls for the spirited widow Lady Marion (Oscar® winner Cate Blanchett), a woman sceptical of the identity and motivations of this crusader from the forest. Hoping to earn the hand of Maid Marion and salvage the village, Robin assembles a gang whose lethal mercenary skills are matched only by its appetite for life. Together, they begin preying on the indulgent upper class to correct injustices under the sheriff.

It’s hard to get away from watching this movie without thinking about Gladiator – how it was shot, the characters involved and how the same team are back again for this movie. Not only was it the same production team behind the movie, it also opens using the same piece of forest that we see in the brilliant opening sequence of Gladiator – just 10 miles from my house! There is a distinctly different look in Robin Hood, and an attack on the castle (which they built when I visited) opens the movie with a bang. Danny Huston plays the part of King Richard, a man ‘bankrupt in both wealth and victory’ as the opening titles tell us.

Mark Strong is the English traitor who strikes a deal with the French King to start an uprising in England – an uprising that would see England become a sitting duck and open for attack. After getting wind of this, William Marshal played by William Hurt alerts the king that he must reunite the country to fend off the French before it’s too late.

Ok, so here’s what you all want to know….. Was the film any good? Well, I’m sure you’ll be pleased to hear that in my opinion, yes it was! The action sequences were excellent as was the fight choreography and especially the horse riding. We’ve seen previous photos from the Pembrokeshire coastline where the finale to the movie occurs, and the spectacle displayed is just wonderful. In fact this movie does a great deal to keep the British Tourist Board happy. The helicopter shots through the lush green hills, the wonderful English forests were all great to see in this big-budget American movie. A shout out has to go to Pinewood Studios who also hosted some of the beach landing shots on their giant water stage. Despite the hundreds of horses, extras and masses of crew on set the end result was awesome and is a scene I’d love to watch over again. It was so good I think a little more should have been made over it!

As an aside, the Robin Hood set was the first that I visited (although off my own back) and all the design (headed by Sonja Klaus) was brilliant – but now that I’ve seen the movie I realised how massively underused it was. Maybe I was trying to spot places I’d been but it was a shame the huge village was seen more during the scene in which it’s burnt down than when it was standing tall! I can’t really say this ruined my experience, just something I noticed and was shocked by since it must have taken months to put together. That said, it was refreshing to see a big budget Hollywood movie that wasn’t obsessed with using CGI. Don’t get me wrong, there is CG used in Robin Hood but most of the external structures you see in the movie were built from scratch and this is a massive plus point for me.

Geography always seems to play a part in these Robin Hood films. It was the same in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. How is it that they can travel from Nottingham to the South Coast of England without getting a sweat on? On a horse it would take 2 or 3 days to travel that distance but I guess it’s Hollywood magic.

Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett’s on-screen chemistry came across well, but as I said earlier I felt continually reminded of watching Gladiator. Universal are obviously hoping for a sequel as before the credits roll, the text “And so the legend begins” appears on the screen. Matthew Macfadyen as the Sheriff of Nottingham is massively underused but if there’s a sequel, not doubt he’ll have a bigger part to play.  Mark Strong plays as awesome baddie. We know that from Kick-Ass and he does just as well in this. In fact from now on, all badies should be played by Strong!

Here’s some questions I’ve asked myself:

  1. Will there be a sequel? Probably.
  2. Will I watch it? Absolutely. But I really hope that Crowe sorts his accent out for the next one! Was he from the north, the south, East London or a different country?! I never managed to work it out!
  3. Was it better than Robin Hood Prince of Thieves – ummmm….. I’d say it’s a different movie and you can’t compare the two.
  4. Was it better than Robin Hood Men in Tights? I’ve never seen it so no comment!
  5. Was it better than the Disney animated version of Robin Hood – Of course not!

If you decided to go and see Robin Hood which is out tomorrow, 12th May, I think you’ll enjoy the experience but make sure you come back here and let us know what you thought in the comments below.

About David Sztypuljak

David Sztypuljak is the Co-Founder and Editor of HeyUGuys. He loves all things movies, often even the terrible films that others hate! Since starting HeyUGuys, he's been able to interview and meet some amazing people and hopes this continues going forward!

  • LizzieJ

    I really enjoyed seeing all your photos of the sets as they were being built, and have been looking forward to seeing how they were used in the movie. Shame they aren't seen more — I, too, was impressed at the lengths Ridley Scott went to be authentic to the time period.

    Hope to see it this weekend…thanks for the review!

  • LizzieJ

    I really enjoyed seeing all your photos of the sets as they were being built, and have been looking forward to seeing how they were used in the movie. Shame they aren't seen more — I, too, was impressed at the lengths Ridley Scott went to be authentic to the time period.

    Hope to see it this weekend…thanks for the review!

  • Don Heller

    Thanks for the review! Always wanted to visit a set. Sounds like this one was pretty awesome! This is one the wife & will catch for a nice evening out. Thanks again!

  • Sue T.

    So happy for the thumbs-up review. Fortunately (or some would say “unfortunately”), I've never seen Gladiator so I won't be picking out the similarities. I confess I probably wouldn't even be seeing this movie if it wasn't for Matthew Macfadyen, however small his part may be. So, I hope that you are right in predicting a sequel (for above mentioned reason!). Looking forward to seeing it this weekend!

  • http://www.heyuguys.co.uk HeyUGuys

    Please, please, please, please, please watch Gladiator! But after you've seen this….. please!

  • Sue T.

    I will do my best, but I am so far behind on film viewing, I fear it won't be for quite some time!

  • Levi S.

    It should be a crime that you have not seen Robin Hood -Men in Tights. Just my honest opinion :-)

  • Baz_mann

    We're men (manly men!), We're men in tights… YES!

  • Baz_mann

    Dave, does Crowe's persistent poe-faced delivery start to grate at any pont? That's my biggest fear for this film.

  • Baz_mann

    We're men (manly men!), We're men in tights… YES!

  • Baz_mann

    Dave, does Crowe's persistent poe-faced delivery start to grate at any pont? That's my biggest fear for this film.

  • http://www.haynato.com/movies/robin-hood-movie-online Watch Robin Hood Movie

    Robin Hood Movie is really great. The comeback tandeem of Ridley and Crowe will surely hit like their previous movie Gladiator.

  • http://www.haynato.com/movies/robin-hood-movie-online Watch Robin Hood Movie

    Robin Hood Movie is really great. The comeback tandeem of Ridley and Crowe will surely hit like their previous movie Gladiator.

  • t_buck

    I worked as an extra on this movie, and I have to say the attention to detail on the sets was second to none, every hut you see was dressed inside and out. From the cooking utensils, the pheasants and the real smoked eels outside the castle in the London scenes…. trust me, you may not see so much detail in the movie, but it was there and it was an awesome experience. I applaud Ridley Scott for going to such lengths to make the details in this movie so authentic.

  • t_buck

    I worked as an extra on this movie, and I have to say the attention to detail on the sets was second to none, every hut you see was dressed inside and out. From the cooking utensils, the pheasants and the real smoked eels outside the castle in the London scenes…. trust me, you may not see so much detail in the movie, but it was there and it was an awesome experience. I applaud Ridley Scott for going to such lengths to make the details in this movie so authentic.

  • Sharkey

    Just saw this film, it was truly awful, a massive disappointment. Was nothing short of agricultural drama and a bad one at that if you are unfortunate enough to imagine such a film

  • Sharkey

    Just saw this film, it was truly awful, a massive disappointment. Was nothing short of agricultural drama and a bad one at that if you are unfortunate enough to imagine such a film

  • Mike

    Poor, and should have been great. Ridley Scott's attention to detail was fantastic at times, depicting what England probably looked like in those times. Then he goes and uses landing craft for a French invasion in 1200 AD. But it was a lack of any gripping story or tension, wooden acting from the leads and a stupid battle scene at the end that marked this down as a turkey. This came nowhere near 'Gladitor' standard.

  • davidemslie

    Saw this last night and was massively disappointed. Crowe was on autopilot compared with what he can do, Cate Blancett didn't appear to have any interest in him at all, and the mangling of history was astonishingly inept. The last 45 minutes were frankly a joke. How does an iterinerant archer end up jumping on a horse and leading an army? And feel free to check your history books to get any details of the battle of Brighton beach when Brits repelled the French invasion.
    Oh dear, too much hype, too many cliches and too many jaw dropping moments (in astonishment of the script). My favourite was when wicked King John said “I suppose all englishmen should be provided with a castle” and Robin actually says “An Englishman's home is his castle!” Purleese !!!!!!

  • davidemslie

    Saw this last night and was massively disappointed. Crowe was on autopilot compared with what he can do, Cate Blancett didn't appear to have any interest in him at all, and the mangling of history was astonishingly inept. The last 45 minutes were frankly a joke. How does an itinerant archer end up jumping on a horse and leading an army? And feel free to check your history books to get any details of the battle of Brighton beach when Brits repelled the French invasion.
    Oh dear, too much hype, too many cliches and too many jaw dropping moments (in astonishment of the script). My favourite was when wicked King John said “I suppose all englishmen should be provided with a castle” and Robin actually says “An Englishman's home is his castle!” Purleese !!!!!!

  • BingoMCMXCIII

    Saw this Friday and I have to say that I thought this film was amazing, the attention to detail and the camera work made it a memorable experience. Also very glad they didn't make it 3D to try and fit in with recent trends.

  • BingoMCMXCIII

    Saw this Friday and I have to say that I thought this film was amazing, the attention to detail and the camera work made it a memorable experience. Also very glad they didn't make it 3D to try and fit in with recent trends.

  • Johan A Kruger

    Just walked out on this movie, it is truly a terrible documentary on medieval agricultural barons of north england unhappy about their king. There is more sexual chemistry between a farmer and his sheep than between Russel Crowe and that lady that was in Lord of the Rings… all shot on digital HD with astonishingly bad digital effects and shaky camera movements… Im not sure what the writers of this blog were smoking when they saw the movie…

  • Johan A Kruger

    Just walked out on this movie, it is truly a terrible documentary on medieval agricultural barons of north england unhappy about their king. There is more sexual chemistry between a farmer and his sheep than between Russel Crowe and that lady that was in Lord of the Rings… all shot on digital HD with astonishingly bad digital effects and shaky camera movements… Im not sure what the writers of this blog were smoking when they saw the movie…

  • jb

    Movie was OK ,Really thought the ending was bad ,especially the French landing craft.

  • jb

    Movie was OK ,Really thought the ending was bad ,especially the French landing craft.

  • Daniel Gadd

    Ridley Scott you are an arse!!!! What a load of complete claptrap. What where you thinking of, trying to recreate Omaha Beach landings during the medieval period with 12th CENTURY LANDING CRAFT??????? *****…..Oh yes and if you are going to poorly dress up some Ex military landing craft with oars and the odd bit of timber for Christ sake get them to turn off the bl**dy propellers. Also why in all thats decent did you feel the need to dress Marrion in Armour and have her effectively ride down a cliff (there was no other way for her to get to that position!!!) into the middle of the battle being followed by 15 naked kids on ponies. Where you trying to shoehorn something vagely female appeasing 12a into the picture or what. Also with the Archers positioned where they were there was completely no reason for anyone to have charged down to the beach they could have annihilated the french without comitting a single mounted unit. It is one thing asking us to suspend our disbelief but asking us to accept that kind of stupid tactical error is tosh. Don't even get me started on the possibility of Marrion being able to string a longbow one handed at the beginning of the movie. Considering your outstanding back catalogue of classic/epic/cult movies you really blew it this time. This will not be remembered as your medieval gladiator.

  • Daniel Gadd

    So why blow it all with the rissable landing craft? Marion Fighting (have you ever seen a female fighting in the beauex tapestry? there is a reason you know!!), Marion stringing a longbow one handed, the rissable landing craft?????

  • Daniel Gadd

    Ridley Scott you are an arse!!!! What a load of complete claptrap. What where you thinking of, trying to recreate Omaha Beach landings during the medieval period with 12th CENTURY LANDING CRAFT??????? *****…..Oh yes and if you are going to poorly dress up some Ex military landing craft with oars and the odd bit of timber for Christ sake get them to turn off the bl**dy propellers. Also why in all thats decent did you feel the need to dress Marrion in Armour and have her effectively ride down a cliff (there was no other way for her to get to that position!!!) into the middle of the battle being followed by 15 naked kids on ponies. Where you trying to shoehorn something vagely female appeasing 12a into the picture or what. Also with the Archers positioned where they were there was completely no reason for anyone to have charged down to the beach they could have annihilated the french without comitting a single mounted unit. It is one thing asking us to suspend our disbelief but asking us to accept that kind of stupid tactical error is tosh. Don't even get me started on the possibility of Marrion being able to string a longbow one handed at the beginning of the movie. Considering your outstanding back catalogue of classic/epic/cult movies you really blew it this time. This will not be remembered as your medieval gladiator.

  • Daniel Gadd

    So why blow it all with the rissable landing craft? Marion Fighting (have you ever seen a female fighting in the beauex tapestry? there is a reason you know!!), Marion stringing a longbow one handed, the rissable landing craft?????

  • Kris Dwornik

    Brilliantly made Ridley Scott film againn

    Shame though that although I'm told there is no hard evidence of fact or truth about Robin Hood THERE IS a universally accepted story line.

    Every single 'fact' in this film is TOTALLY ficticious and nothing to do with the original story!

    Oh and in the beach battle at the end watch for the guy charging with a standard claw hammer on a 2ft handle;

  • Kris Dwornik

    Brilliantly made Ridley Scott film againn

    Shame though that although I'm told there is no hard evidence of fact or truth about Robin Hood THERE IS a universally accepted story line.

    Every single 'fact' in this film is TOTALLY ficticious and nothing to do with the original story!

    Oh and in the beach battle at the end watch for the guy charging with a standard claw hammer on a 2ft handle;

  • bobhgh

    so dissapointing.ridley scott is a genious, but this film was terrible.it was nothing to do with the story of robin hood. there was no emotion, and we all struggled to connect with the characters. compare this film to gladiator, and the final cut of kingdom of heaven for example.they where amazing films.

  • Stuart

    Anyone else notice that the crops were planted, grew and were harvested in a matter of days? Besides the fact that they heard the french were setting off in the English Channel and got there before they did? Some even rowed all the way, good work …

  • Stuart

    Anyone else notice that the crops were planted, grew and were harvested in a matter of days? Besides the fact that they heard the french were setting off in the English Channel and got there before they did? Some even rowed all the way, good work …

  • Squirley

    This movie was absolutely terrible.

  • Squirley

    This movie was absolutely terrible.

  • Unimpressed

    Jesus christ this reviewer is an amateur, misses out key criticism and seems to be biased by the fact that “ZOMG ITS BY MYNE HAUZE!!!”. First and last time I am reading his reviews. Oh, and concluding with questions he asks himself? Ridiculous and infantile.

  • Unimpressed

    Jesus christ this reviewer is an amateur, misses out key criticism and seems to be biased by the fact that “ZOMG ITS BY MYNE HAUZE!!!”. First and last time I am reading his reviews. Oh, and concluding with questions he asks himself? Ridiculous and infantile.

  • jasmine<3

    This film was terrible. I've never been so bored of a film. EVER. And Marion in armor? Jesus.
    Next time you film “Robin hood” atleast have the decency to give the Nottinghamshire accent!

  • jasmine<3

    This film was terrible. I've never been so bored of a film. EVER. And Marion in armor? Jesus.
    Next time you film “Robin hood” atleast have the decency to give the Nottinghamshire accent!

  • I hate you ridley scott…

    just watched the movie, fucking deplorable, so so so many inaccuracies i wanted my money back, but that hammer is not one of them, the warhammer was a period accurate weapon , around 2 to 3 feet long with either a spike or a claw opposite the blunt head, that being said…. fucking higgins boats… fucking funeral pyres for christians… norman shields carried by the french when the normans left france 300 years earlier… omfg and forget that she can string a longbow one- handed(something that i can tell you takes every ounce of strength from me), swords of the period weighed 30-40 lbs, to swing that once or twice is hard as fuck, let alone run and fight well with it, and then the armor, a suit of armor from the 1300's weighs upwards of 155 lbs or more, to assume that bitch could be that thin and dainty, and not just carry but fight in nearly 200 lbs of shit is too much… wtf, after this horrible piece of shit, i will never go see another movie that either ridley scott or russell crow had anything to do with…

  • t_buck is dumbass

    authentic??????? how? the 1940's higgins boats were authentic to the period to be sure but wut about the fact that next to nothing in this movie is historicly accurate…. retard

  • I hate you ridley scott…

    just watched the movie, fucking deplorable, so so so many inaccuracies i wanted my money back, but that hammer is not one of them, the warhammer was a period accurate weapon , around 2 to 3 feet long with either a spike or a claw opposite the blunt head, that being said…. fucking higgins boats… fucking funeral pyres for christians… norman shields carried by the french when the normans left france 300 years earlier… omfg and forget that she can string a longbow one- handed(something that i can tell you takes every ounce of strength from me), swords of the period weighed 30-40 lbs, to swing that once or twice is hard as fuck, let alone run and fight well with it, and then the armor, a suit of armor from the 1300's weighs upwards of 155 lbs or more, to assume that bitch could be that thin and dainty, and not just carry but fight in nearly 200 lbs of shit is too much… wtf, after this horrible piece of shit, i will never go see another movie that either ridley scott or russell crow had anything to do with…

  • t_buck is dumbass

    authentic??????? how? the 1940's higgins boats were authentic to the period to be sure but wut about the fact that next to nothing in this movie is historicly accurate…. retard

  • kev

    was the production usa based as im interested to know how you went about working as an extra on this production. I personally liked it and glad it went for a different story to the prince of thieves predecessor. And as an Englishman i couldn't help but smile at the quote “So a castle for everyone man?”, “everyone Englishmans home is his castle”

  • kev

    was the production usa based as im interested to know how you went about working as an extra on this production. I personally liked it and glad it went for a different story to the prince of thieves predecessor. And as an Englishman i couldn't help but smile at the quote “So a castle for everyone man?”, “everyone Englishmans home is his castle”

  • http://www.air-jordan-2.com/ air jordan 2

    It looks good,I have learn a recruit!
    Recently,I found an excellent online store, the XX are completely various, good quality and cheap price,it’s worth buying!

  • http://docapplescorner.com Chuck Apple

    Robin Hood was terrific. This is something of a hobby of mine. I'm 62, so I've seen most Robin Hood efforts first run. This one does the entire legend a service by rewriting the overall storyline and giving it a nice, grown up boost. I completely agree with the other 2 comments. Crowe is fine especially since this is not a movie about jokes, but about times that are very dark. We have way too many comic book movies that neither address anything on the minds of the adults in the room nor do they offer a reasonable upbeat, hopeful resolution that does not involve blood and gore and those little bags that you get on airplanes.
    This was a real popcorn movie. The reading didn't bother me. I love print and the little bit here was just fine. As were the terrific credits that the reviewer notes. My sweetie says that a movie has to pass the Cynthia butt test. This Robin Hood certainly achieved that test.
    One last point. Despite the fact that this movie plays fast and free with the historical facts in question (it is a movie after all), it does introduce a good deal of history that never gets any attention, namely, the dreadful reign of John, the invasion of the French, and the civil war in England.
    While no one will ever replace Errol Flynn or Richard Greene for me, Russell Crowe certainly shows me a new vision of Robin and does so along with a wonderful action movie.

  • http://docapplescorner.com Chuck Apple

    Robin Hood was terrific. This is something of a hobby of mine. I'm 62, so I've seen most Robin Hood efforts first run. This one does the entire legend a service by rewriting the overall storyline and giving it a nice, grown up boost. I completely agree with the other 2 comments. Crowe is fine especially since this is not a movie about jokes, but about times that are very dark. We have way too many comic book movies that neither address anything on the minds of the adults in the room nor do they offer a reasonable upbeat, hopeful resolution that does not involve blood and gore and those little bags that you get on airplanes.
    This was a real popcorn movie. The reading didn't bother me. I love print and the little bit here was just fine. As were the terrific credits that the reviewer notes. My sweetie says that a movie has to pass the Cynthia butt test. This Robin Hood certainly achieved that test.
    One last point. Despite the fact that this movie plays fast and free with the historical facts in question (it is a movie after all), it does introduce a good deal of history that never gets any attention, namely, the dreadful reign of John, the invasion of the French, and the civil war in England.
    While no one will ever replace Errol Flynn or Richard Greene for me, Russell Crowe certainly shows me a new vision of Robin and does so along with a wonderful action movie.

  • http://richardbrodie.com Richard Brodie

    Coincidentally a classic new Robin Hood poem has been written coinciding with the release of this new Robin Hood movie. Check out “The Outlaw”, by a great modern American poet, Ellin Anderson:

    http://www.ellinanderson.com/RobinHood.htm

  • http://richardbrodie.com Richard Brodie

    Coincidentally a classic new Robin Hood poem has been written coinciding with the release of this new Robin Hood movie. Check out “The Outlaw”, by a great modern American poet, Ellin Anderson:

    http://www.ellinanderson.com/RobinHood.htm

  • musica1

    Why do people worry about accents in films set in the 12th century? Do we really know what kind of accents people had back then? If they time-traveled and talked to us, we probably wouldn't be able to place the location of their accent and also wouldn't even understand most of the phrases they would use. I think a vague accent is actually better.

  • Lololol

    You fool

  • Foolish

    Good god. We do know. Look it up. The wonders of historical research you ignorant little man.

  • Lies

    Sure you did mate.

  • http://www.heyuguys.co.uk HeyUGuys

    I completely agree from what I saw at the forest set, it was just such a shame we didnt see more of it in the movie.

  • Evlandry12

    I agree with most of your points, however, it is a documented fact that the average one-handed typical knights sword weighed between 3-7lbs. Even at this weight you would get tired after several blows. Also, field plate armor weighed approximatley 75lbs. Heavier armor was used in defense mode only in besieged fortifications where the user would not have to move around much.

  • Hwthorn

    Get a vocabulary.

  • Asdf

    Daniel pretty much nailed it. I was really shocked to see the 12th century French had WWII landing craft That was pretty dumb. That really ruined the battle.
    I did not think about it at the time but it seems like Marion did come in from the opposite side of the beach that the men came from. I did like the angle of King Richard not being a good King, after all Kings were more than likely arrogant tyrants, “power corrupts…” and all.
    But over all I liked it until I saw the landing craft, the rest I was willing to over look
    since it is just a move.