Simultaneous Worldwide Release Is Long Overdue

Shutter Island is released in the UK this weekend. I’m looking forward to seeing it but, unfortunately, i know what happens at the end. It’s my own fault, i accept that. I ignored a spoiler warning, and paid the price. But if all movies had simultaneous worldwide release, it wouldn’t have been an issue.

It’s not even that bad with Shutter Island, we’re only a month behind. What really brought the issue home was last weekend’s Oscar ceremony. Jeff Bridges won best actor. It has been said that whilst his performance IS good in Crazy Heart, it has very much been awarded to him in recognition of all his great work over the years. Sandra Bullock won best actress. Just the day before, she had been awarded a Razzie for worst actress for All About Steve. Her win at the Academy Awards was somewhat contentious, and many have questioned whether she deserved the award. As a film writer, i want to be able to be part of the debate. The problem is, in the UK, we haven’t been able to see the performances in question. Crazy Heart went on wide release just two days before the ceremony, and we have to wait until the end of the month for The Blind Side.

When you write about movies, you go into most knowing far too much about the plot. When movies are release in the US weeks before, it makes it that much harder. It has gotten better. I remember waiting months and months for movies to make it to these shores. The difference was, we really didn’t know much about them. The problem now is that the world has gotten so much smaller. Newspapers and magazines carry far more information about films from across the pond, because there is more interest in them than ever. But it’s the birth of the Internet that has really caused the big problem. There is now no media divide between Britain and the US. When a film is released in America, reviews, spoilers and arguments immediately flood the ‘net, and it’s impossible not to find out essential story elements.

As a blogger, there are other complexities based around this. I went to a press screening for 9 last year, and as is usual, there was an embargo on reviews, until the week of release. The problem was, 9 had been on general release in the States for weeks. I could read any one of hundreds of reviews, but had to sit on my own for two months. Crazy.

In theory, there is no real reason for studios to care if the rest of the world has to wait to see their movies, but look deeper and you see things have changed. Where domestic gross far outweighed international numbers, they eventually came together to where the split was pretty even, and now in many cases the amount of money made overseas exceeds the final domestic gross. Growth in markets in Asia and the Middle East mean that they are just as important as Europe when it comes to marketing and distribution.

This being the case, the increasing importance of Internet marketing means that it makes sense to release films at the same time worldwide, as it reduces the need to spend money on advertising campaigns, the cost will only come in one combined burst. As well as this, a big reason for the huge amount of piracy that goes on is overseas demand for movies not yet released in particular countries. Simultaneous release wouldn’t eradicate piracy, there will always be those that prefer to buy DVDs than go to cinemas. But there will be less incentive to watch inferior quality copies of movies when they are available to watch in theatres locally from the very beginning. When a film is available to watch in one market so long before others, it gives plenty of time to make a decent recording, and make thousands of copies for sale around the world. If studios are serious about combating piracy, they really need to look at the effect this has.

There are clearly many reasons why releases are not synchronised worldwide, and some of them will be impossible to overcome. But i think it is important to recognise the increasing impact overseas box office is having. To respect the needs of audiences in overseas markets as well as domestically, and to cater to them by providing the people what they want, on a global scale.

 Bazmann – You can follow me on Twiter at www.twitter.com/baz_mann

About Barry Steele

Freelance writer, have been writing about film for three years. Also an aspiring novelist working on my first novel. Extremely lazy. Older than I look.

  • http://www.fadedglamour.co.uk saamFG

    By “worldwide”, do you actually mean just North America and the UK? Because it seems that way. But then you do mention some of the other “markets” and I get a bit confused.

    If you're referring to a simultaneous release date across the world as opposed to an ethnocentric thing, do you think the linguistic barrier is a good enough excuse (as in the need for translation/subtitles/dubbing/etc) to explain why non-English speaking countries don't get films at the same time as English dominated countries do? I'm starting to think that maybe it isn't.

    I definitely agree that we need to have release dates as close as possible to across the pond though, if not the same.

    - saamFG, fadedglamour.co.uk

  • BuzzClunk

    The waiting time does seem to have been reduced for most films, but UP was one big exception. I think we had to wait about 5 months before that came out. That really annoyed me. And in the end I managed to miss it in the cinemas in the UK!

    In my opinion the language barrier isn't really an excuse as on most films you can do dubbing whilst still in normal post production and not effect the finish time. Sound post can takes place before colour correction and other visual tweakings. And the vocal recordings (in any language) will often take less time than the sound design. But it does depend on who is making the film and if they can be bothered to do foreign dubs at the same time as the native language.

  • Baz_mann

    I mean worldwide, but my anecdotal evidence is obviously UK based. I think the language element does make it difficult, but like anything, if studios really wanted to do it, they could.

  • fanboy_d

    AGREED.

  • Me

    I'm not sure most countries have enough theaters to accomodate WW release dates, especially during the summer.

  • http://twitter.com/victoriarusso Victoria Russo

    I am in Moscow right now, at least 10 of the films that are not released in UK yet, are already released here. So the language barrier is not really a problem for a market like Russian, I am not saying small countries.
    On the other hand, there are schedule-conflicting issues between distributors and companies. Making all the schedule put nicely together would require the best logistics in the world. (or maybe just one computer LOL).
    what about promoting events? They want to make prmieres and nice events at least in UK, Europe and USA, they can't do this simultaneously.

    And also, companies need to study the market before releasing the film onto the big market. I know that several years ago there was a place in Switzerland where all the films were released months ahead of USA and Europe, cause marketing researches revealed that town being the best representation of European market.
    Not sure, how everything works and this is a compicate subject that is worth looking at.
    I think that gaps should be at least not as huge as they are right now.