Comments on: Is It Too Soon For A Sherlock Sequel?

By: Kobe Bryant Shoes

Kobe Bryant Shoes — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:09:41 +0000

Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the
write's unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those Wisdominthemind.com
sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally

By: JamesP1977

JamesP1977 — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:31:55 +0000

Very well put. Sequels are far better given time between them, and as you say The Dark Knight is a prime example of this. Making back to back sequels – the last two Matrix films and Pirates films, for example – is also a bad idea. I always felt with those two frachises that there were 3 films to make. But I'd rather they'd have made a top class second film, then waited and had a top class third, than rush them out together.

Sherlock Holmes has clearly been written with sequels in mind – or to leave the possibility open, as with Batman Begins. But it stands up on its own anyway.

Wait a couple of years then bring out a sequel. Iron Man 2 has had time to brew (two years) just about. 3 years is probably a better amount of time, as we had with the Batman films. 4/5 years may be waiting too long.

By: tedcunn

tedcunn — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:45:53 +0000

There's one thing wrong with this article – it assumes they are going to start work on Sherlock Holmes 2 with a blank slate. Given the way the introduced Moriarty as a villain for a possible sequel in the first film, how do we know they didn't already have sequels worked out?

It's obvious there was a desire to turn Sherlock Holmes into a franchise so it may very well have been that plans were in motion for a sequel before the first film was even released.

By: Joey

Joey — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:43:50 +0000

Very aptly put. I couldn't have put it better myself.